4.6 Article

Development, diet and dynamism: longitudinal and cross-sectional predictors of gut microbial communities in wild baboons

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 1312-1325

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12852

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. National Institute on Aging
  3. [IOS 1053461]
  4. [IBN 9985910]
  5. [IBN 0322613]
  6. [IBN 0322781]
  7. [BCS 0323553]
  8. [BCS 0323596]
  9. [DEB 0846286]
  10. [DEB 0846532]
  11. [IOS 0919200]
  12. [R01AG034513-01]
  13. [P01AG031719]
  14. Direct For Biological Sciences
  15. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1053461, 0919200] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gut bacterial communities play essential roles in host biology, but to date we lack information on the forces that shape gut microbiota between hosts and over time in natural populations. Understanding these forces in wild primates provides a valuable comparative context that enriches scientific perspectives on human gut microbiota. To this end, we tested predictors of gut microbial composition in a well-studied population of wild baboons. Using cross-sectional and longitudinal samples collected over 13 years, we found that baboons harbour gut microbiota typical of other omnivorous primates, albeit with an especially high abundance of Bifidobacterium. Similar to previous work in humans and other primates, we found strong effects of both developmental transitions and diet on gut microbial composition. Strikingly, baboon gut microbiota appeared to be highly dynamic such that samples collected from the same individual only a few days apart were as different from each other as samples collected over 10 years apart. Despite the dynamic nature of baboon gut microbiota, we identified a set of core taxa that is common among primates, supporting the hypothesis that microbiota codiversify with their host species. Our analysis identified two tentative enterotypes in adult baboons that differ from those of humans and chimpanzees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据