4.3 Article

Autophagy induction by celastrol augments protection against bleomycin-induced experimental pulmonary fibrosis in rats: Role of adaptor protein p62/SQSTM1

期刊

PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 47-61

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.04.003

关键词

Autophagy; Pulmonary fibrosis; p62; Celastrol; Bleomycin; mTOR

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India [09/115(0776)/2015-EMR-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a chronic pulmonary disease of unknown cause with high mortality. Autophagy is an important homeostatic process that decides the fate of cells under stress conditions. This study is aimed to investigate whether impaired autophagic activity leads to fibrosis and pharmacological induction of autophagy provides protection against bleomycin (BLM)-induced PE A single dose of BLM (3 U/kg body weight) was administered intratracheally to induce fibrosis in rats. Celastrol, a triterpenoid (5 mg/kg body weight, intraperitoneally) was given in every 81 h for a period of 28 days. Western blot and Confocal microscopic analysis of rat lung tissue samples revealed that celastrol induces autophagy in BLM-induced rats. Transmission electron microscopic analysis supports the above findings. Celastrol increased the expressions of Beclin 1 and Vps 34, promoted the up-regulation of Atg5-Atg12-16 formation and enhanced the lipidation of LC3I to LC3II suggesting induction of autophagy by celastrol provide protection against lung fibrosis. Further, we revealed that celastrol activates autophagy by inhibiting PI3K/Alct mediated mTOR expression. In addition, we show evidences that lack of autophagy leads to accumulation of p62, an autophagy adaptor protein that is degraded by celastrol. This study helps to describe the importance of autophagic cell death as a possible therapeutic target against lung fibrosis, and celastrol as a potential candidate for the treatment options for PE. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据