4.1 Article

Discovery of a keV-X-ray excess in RX J1856.5-3754

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psx025

关键词

stars: individual (RX J1856.5-3754); stars: neutron; X-rays: stars

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [16H00949, 26109506, 16K13787, 23000004, 15J018450, 24684010, 26670560, 15H03641]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K13787, 26670560, 16H00949, 24684010] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RX J1856.5-3754 is the brightest and nearest (similar to 120 pc) source among thermally emitting isolated neutron stars. Its spectra observed with XMM-Newton and Chandra satellites are well-fitted with the two-temperature (kT(infinity) similar to 32 and 63 eV) blackbody model. Fitting ten sets of the data from Suzaku XIS 0, XIS 1, XIS 3, and XMM-Newton EPIC-pn with the two-temperature blackbody model, we discover an excess emission, 16%-26% in 0.8-1.2 keV. We examine possible causes of this keV-X-ray excess; uncertainty in the background, pile-up of the low-energy photons, and confusion of other sources. None of them succeeds in explaining the keV-X-ray excess observed with different instruments. We thus consider that this keV-X-ray excess most likely originates in RX J1856.5-3754. However, it is difficult to constrain the spectral shape of the keV-X-ray excess. A third blackbody component with kT(infinity) = 137(-14)(+18) eV, an additional power-law component with a photon index Gamma = 3.4(-0.6)(+0.5) or Comptonization of blackbody seed photons into a power law with a photon index Gamma(c) = 4.3(-0.8)(+0.8) can reproduce the keV-X-ray excess. We also search for the periodicity of 0.8-1.2 keV data, since 7.055 s pulsation is discovered in the 0.15-1.2 keV band in the XMM Newton EPIC-pn data (similar to 1.5%). We only obtain the upper limit of pulsed fraction <3% in the keV-X-ray excess. We briefly discuss the possible origin of the keV-X-ray excess, such as synchrotron radiation and Comptonization of blackbody photons. Key words:

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据