4.4 Article

Alterations of expression of inflammation/immune-related genes in the dorsal and ventral striatum of adult C57BL/6J mice following chronic oxycodone self-administration: a RNA sequencing study

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 234, 期 15, 页码 2259-2275

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4657-y

关键词

Oxycodone self-administration; RNA sequencing; Inflammation and immune-related genes; C57BL/6J mice

资金

  1. NIH [1R01DA029147]
  2. Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  3. NIH Center for Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA)
  4. National Center for Advancing Sciences (NCATS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-medical use of prescription opioids such as the mu opioid receptor (MOP-r) agonist oxycodone is a growing problem in the USA and elsewhere. There is limited information about oxycodone's impact on diverse gene systems in the brain. The current study was designed to examine how chronic oxycodone self-administration (SA) affects gene expression in the terminal areas of the nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopaminergic pathways in mice. Adult male C57BL/6J mice underwent a 14-day oxycodone self-administration procedure (4 h/day, 0.25 mg/kg/infusion, FR1) and were euthanized 1 h after the last session. The dorsal and ventral striata were dissected, and total RNAs were extracted. Gene expressions were examined using RNA sequencing. We found that oxycodone self-administration exposure led to alterations of expression in numerous genes related to inflammation/immune functions in the dorsal striatum (54 upregulated genes and 1 downregulated gene) and ventral striatum (126 upregulated genes and 15 downregulated genes), with 38 upregulated genes identified in both brain regions. This study reveals novel neurobiological mechanisms underlying some of the effects of a commonly abused prescription opioid. We propose that inflammation/immune gene systems may undergo a major change during chronic self-administration of oxycodone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据