4.6 Article

Plasticity of the Right-Lateralized Cognitive Reserve Network in Ageing

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 1749-1759

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx085

关键词

ageing; cognitive reserve; plasticity; transcranial direct current stimulation; visual attention

资金

  1. European Union FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Network Individualised Diagnostics & Rehabilitation of Attention Disorders [606901]
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research
  3. Marie Sklodowska-Curie COFUND Program of the European Commission
  4. Erasmus+ mobility programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cognitive reserve (CR) is the phenomenon where older adults with more cognitively stimulating environments show less age-related cognitive decline. The right-lateralized fronto-parietal network has been proposed to significantly contribute to CR and visual attention in ageing. In this study we tested whether plasticity of this network may be harnessed in ageing. We assessed CR and parameters of visual attention capacity in older adults. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was employed to increase right fronto-parietal activity during a lateralized whole-report task. At baseline, older adults with greater CR showed a stronger hemifield asymmetry in processing speed towards the left visual-field, indicative of stronger involvement of the right hemisphere in these individuals. Correspondingly, processing speed improved during right prefrontal tDCS. Older adults with lower levels of CR showed tDCS-related improvements in processing speed in the left but not right hemifield: thus tDCS temporarily altered their processing speed asymmetry to resemble that of their high reserve peers. The finding that stronger right hemisphere involvement is related to CR supports Robertson's theory. Furthermore, preserved plasticity within the right prefrontal cortex in older adults suggests this is a viable target area to improve visual processing speed, a hallmark of age-related decline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据