4.7 Article

Effects of replacement of Moringa oleifera for berseem clover in the diets of Nubian goats on feed utilisation, and milk yield, composition and fatty acid profile

期刊

ANIMAL
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 964-972

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731117002336

关键词

berseem clover; feed utilisation; lactating goat; milk; Moringa oleifera

资金

  1. National Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT, Mexico)
  2. World Academy of Sciences (TWAS, Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Replacement of conventional feedstuffs with cheap non-conventional ingredients may improve livestock performance and the quality of their products, particularly milk. The study considered the effects of Moringa oleifera (MO) foliage in replacement of berseem clover (BC) on feed utilisation and lactational performance in Nubian goats. A total of 16 lactating Nubian does, weighing 36.2 +/- 0.8 kg, were randomly assigned to four experimental treatments containing 0, 125, 250 and 375 g of MO per kg diet to replace 0 (M0), 25 (M25), 50 (M50) and 75% (M75) of BC (on dry matter (DM) basis) in a quadruplicated 4 x 4 Latin square design. The MO diets increased (P < 0.01) feed intake and nutrient digestibility. Feeding MO diets improved (P < 0.01) ruminal volatile fatty acids, acetate and propionate but reduced (P < 0.01) valerate and iso-butyrate. Moringa diets increased (P < 0.01) serum total protein, albumin and glucose but decreased (P < 0.05) cholesterol and triglycerides. Milk yield and energy corrected milk, and milk total solids, fat and energy content were increased (P < 0.01) in MO diets. Yields of milk components and energy were greater (P < 0.05) for MO diets than for control diet. Milk total saturated fatty acids and athrogenicity index were lower (P < 0.01), and unsaturated fatty acids, conjugated fatty acids and UFA/SFA ratio higher (P < 0.05) for MO diets. It is concluded that feeding MO to replace 75% DM of BC improved feed utilisation, ruminal fermentation, and milk yield and quality in lactating Nubian goats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据