期刊
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
卷 124, 期 3, 页码 346-360出版社
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000051
关键词
tool use; action knowledge; manipulation knowledge; parietal lobe; temporal lobe
资金
- National Institutes of Health [NIH R01 NS065409, R01 NS099061]
- Albert Einstein Society of Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute
The reasoning-based approach championed by Francois Osiurak and Arnaud Badets (Osiurak & Badets, 2016) denies the existence of sensory-motor memories of tool use except in limited circumstances, and suggests instead that most tool use is subserved solely by online technical reasoning about tool properties. In this commentary, I highlight the strengths and limitations of the reasoning-based approach and review a number of lines of evidence that manipulation knowledge is in fact used in tool action tasks. In addition, I present a two routeneurocognitive model of tool use called the Two Action Systems Plus (2AS +) framework that posits a complementary role for online and stored information and specifies the neurocognitive substrates of task-relevant action selection. This framework, unlike the reasoning based approach, has the potential to integrate the existing psychological and functional neuroanatomic data in the tool use domain.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据