4.0 Article

Fecal Enterobacteriales enrichment is associated with increased in vivo intestinal permeability in humans

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13649

关键词

Endotoxemia; glucose control; intestinal microbiota; intestinal permeability; type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network (CRN): Kent, Surrey and Sussex
  2. NERC [NE/L011956/1]
  3. FNRS, PDR (Projet de Recherche) [T.0138.14]
  4. FRFS-WELBIO [WELBIO-CR-2012S-02R]
  5. Funds Baillet Latour
  6. ERC Starting Grant [336452-ENIGMO]
  7. EFSD clinical research grant
  8. NERC [NE/L011956/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been linked with increased intestinal permeability, but the clinical significance of this phenomenon remains unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential link between glucose control, intestinal permeability, diet and intestinal microbiota in patients with T2D. Thirty-two males with well-controlled T2D and 30 age-matched male controls without diabetes were enrolled in a case-control study. Metabolic parameters, inflammatory markers, endotoxemia, and intestinal microbiota in individuals subdivided into high (HP) and normal (LP) colonic permeability groups, were the main outcomes. In T2D, the HP group had significantly higher fasting glucose (P = 0.034) and plasma nonesterified fatty acid levels (P = 0.049) compared with the LP group. Increased colonic permeability was also linked with altered abundances of selected microbial taxa. The microbiota of both T2D and control HP groups was enriched with Enterobacteriales. In conclusion, high intestinal permeability was associated with poorer fasting glucose control in T2D patients and changes in some microbial taxa in both T2D patients and nondiabetic controls. Therefore, enrichment in the gram-negative order Enterobacteriales may characterize impaired colonic permeability prior to/independently from a disruption in glucose tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据