3.8 Article

In vitro comparison of the adsorption inflammatory mediators by blood purification devices

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s40635-018-0177-2

关键词

Adsorption; Blood purification; Cytokines; Endotoxins; oXiris; Septic shock; Removal rate

资金

  1. Baxter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Septic shock, a leading cause of acute kidney injury, induces release of pro-/anti-inflammatory mediators, leading to increased mortality and poor renal recovery. This is the first in vitro study directly comparing three single-use blood purification devices in terms of removing sepsis-associated mediators and endotoxins. Methods: In vitro hemoperfusion was performed using oXiris (R), CytoSorb (R), and Toraymyxin (R). Heparinized human plasma from healthy volunteers was pre-incubated with pathologic quantities of inflammatory mediators and filtered in a closed-loop circulation model for 2 h. For each device, the removal of 27 inflammatory mediators was measured over time. Endotoxin removal mediated by oXiris and Toraymyxin was assessed using hemoperfusion over 6 h. Results: Endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide) removal was most rapid with Toraymyxin; mean adsorptive clearance over the first 30 min was 20 ml/min vs - 8 ml/min with oXiris (p < 0.05). There was minimal endotoxin removal with CytoSorb (1 ml/min). At 120 min, there was no significant difference between the endotoxin removal rates using oXiris (mean +/- standard deviation, 68.0 +/- 4.4%) and Toraymyxin (83.4 +/- 3.8%); both were significantly higher vs CytoSorb (- 6.3 +/- 4.9%; p < 0.05). Total removal with oXiris was 6.9 pg vs 9.7 pg for Toraymyxin, where the total lipopolysaccharide quantity introduced was approximately 15.8 pg. Removal rates of pro-/antiinflammatory cytokines and other inflammatory mediators were similar between oXiris and CytoSorb and were higher with CytoSorb and oXiris vs Toraymyxin. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was only effectively adsorbed by CytoSorb (99.4%). Differences were detected between the adsorption mechanism of the devices; binding to oXiris was mainly ionic, while CytoSorb was hydrophobic. No specific protein adsorption was found qualitatively with Toraymyxin. Conclusions: Adsorption rate kinetics varied for individual inflammatory mediators using the three blood purification devices. Mechanisms of adsorption differed between the devices. oXiris was the only device tested that showed both endotoxin and cytokine removal. oXiris showed similar endotoxin adsorption to Toraymyxin and similar adsorption to CytoSorb for the removal of other inflammatory mediators. Differences in device removal capacities could enable treatment to be more tailored to patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据