4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Financial Implications of Car Ownership and Use: a distributional analysis based on observed spatial variance considering income and domestic energy costs

期刊

TRANSPORT POLICY
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 30-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.12.007

关键词

Car ownership; Transport; Costs; Domestic energy; Spatial; Inequalities

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under the Research Councils UK Energy Programme [EP/K000438/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K000438/1, EP/J004758/1, EP/K000438/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. ESRC [ES/H032258/1, ES/J010669/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/H032258/1, ES/J010669/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K000438/1, EP/K000438/2, EP/J004758/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a new perspective on assessing the financial impacts of private car usage in England and Wales using novel datasets to explore implications of motoring costs (principally Vehicle Excise Duty and road fuel costs) for households as part of the overall costs of their energy budget. Using data from an enhanced version of the Department for Transport 'MOT' vehicle test record database, combined with data on domestic gas and electricity consumption from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (formerly the Department of Energy and Climate Change), patterns of car usage and consequent energy consumption are investigated, and the costs of Vehicle Excise Duty and road fuel examined as a proportion of total expenditure on household direct energy consumption. Through the use of these new datasets it is possible to analyse how these vary spatially and in relation to levels of median income. The findings indicate that motoring costs are strongly regressive, with lower income areas, especially in rural locations, spending around twice as much of their income on motoring costs as the highest income areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据