3.8 Article

Predictors and outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in hospitalized patients with sepsis: data from National Inpatient Sample

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/20009666.2018.1450592

关键词

Sepsis; severe sepsis; invasive mechanical ventilation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Sepsis is a significant cause of mechanical ventilation in hospitalized patients. Objective: The aim of our study was to recognize the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with an increased need for invasive mechanical ventilation in hospitalized sepsis patients. Methods: We used National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2009-2011 to identify sepsis patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics of sepsis patients requiring and not requiring ventilator support and conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to determine odds ratio (OR) of association. Results: A total of 4,827,769 sepsis patients were identified among which 21.38% required invasive ventilation. Multivariate logistic regression [OR (95% CI), p<0.001] determined the following to be associated with increased odds of ventilator use: morbid obesity [1.37 (1.31-1.42)] and age group 35-64 years [1.18 (1.14-1.22)] compared to 18-34 years, whereas females [0.90 (0.88-0.91)] and age >85 years [0.49 (0.47-0.52)] had reduced odds of invasive ventilation. Hyperkalemia [1.12 (1.09-1.16)] and hypernatremia [2.26 (2.16-2.36)] were associated with increased odds while hypokalemia [0.94 (0.91-0.97)] had reduced odds of invasive ventilation. Septic patients requiring IMV had higher length of stay by 9.72 +/- 0.17 days, hospitalization cost by US $ 43010.31 +/- 988.24 and in-hospital mortality (41.33% vs 8.91%). Conclusion: Sepsis is a major cause of intensive care unit admission and initiation of invasive ventilation. Baseline demographic and clinical features affect the need for invasive ventilation. A clear understanding of these risk factors is integral for an appropriate and timely management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据