4.0 Article

Pseudophyllomitus vesiculosus (Larsen and Patterson 1990) Lee, 2002, a Poorly Studied Phagotrophic Biflagellate is the First Characterized Member of Stramenopile Environmental Clade MAST-6

期刊

PROTIST
卷 168, 期 4, 页码 439-451

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2017.06.004

关键词

Flagellar apparatus; MAST; phylogenetic analysis; stramenopiles; ultrastructure

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [13J00587]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [13J00587] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are many eukaryotic lineages that are exclusively composed of environmental sequences and lack information about which species are included. Regarding stramenopiles, at least 18 environmental lineages, known as marine stramenopiles (MAST), have been recognized. Since each MAST lineage forms deep branches in the stramenopiles, the characterization of MAST members is key to understanding the diversity and evolution of stramenopiles. In this study, we established a culture of Pseudophyllomitus vesiculosus, which is a poorly studied phagotrophic flagellate of uncertain taxonomic position. Our molecular phylogenetic analyses based on small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences robustly supported the inclusion of P. vesiculosus in the MAST-6 clade. Our microscopic observations indicated that P. vesiculosus shared characteristics with stramenopiles, including an anterior flagellum that exhibits sinusoidal waves and bears tubular mastigonemes. The flagellar apparatus of P. vesiculosus was also similar to that of other stramenopiles in having a transitional helix and five microtubular roots (R1-R4 and S tubules) including R2 that split into two bands. On the other hand, P. vesiculosus was distinguished from other deep-branching stramenopiles by the combination of flagellar apparatus characteristics. Based on the phylogenetic analyses and microscopic observations, we established Pseudophyllomitidae fam. nov in stramenopiles. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据