3.9 Article

Fault diagnosis of automobile systems using fault tree based on digraph modeling

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13198-017-0693-6

关键词

Automobile system; Fault diagnosis; Digraph model; Fault tree diagram; Hydraulic power steering; System structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fault diagnosis of automobile systems is critical, as it adds-up to repair and maintenance time. It is, therefore, desired to make it efficient and effective. One of the conventional approaches is to use the fault tree diagram. But this approach is inadequate with its implicit system structure. Structure of the system means system elements and their interrelations. To alleviate this limitation, a new approach is suggested wherein the structure is in-built, i.e. incorporated explicitly, through digraph modeling that employs a systems approach of graph theory. A system digraph is developed, considering relationships among input and output parameters of subsystems/components of the automobile system in normal and failed conditions. Fault tree of a failure symptom that represents abnormality or a breakdown of the automobile system is obtained from the system digraph. The novelty is extension of the structural approach to automobile systems using digraph model, which has been successfully applied to chemical and process systems. Step-by-step methodology of the structural approach is presented. Its two main two steps are Steps 1 and 2, i.e. 'Development of Fault tree diagram' and 'Diagnosis of fault using the tree diagram', respectively. The suggested approach is illustrated for hydraulic power steering, an automobile system that is fitted on all current automobiles and particularly, in special purpose vehicles like heavy-duty trucks, earthmovers, dumpers, etc. The suggested approach guides how to diagnose root causes of a fault. The approach is not only helpful to maintenance personnel in effective diagnosis but also in guiding designers in development of reliable automobile systems, accident investigations of automobiles, etc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据