4.2 Review

Physical Exercise and ACE2-Angiotensin-(1-7)-Mas Receptor Axis of the Renin Angiotensin System

期刊

PROTEIN AND PEPTIDE LETTERS
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 809-816

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/0929866524666170728151401

关键词

Physical exercise; physical training; renin angiotensin system; ACE2; angiotensin-(1-7); Mas receptor

资金

  1. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa)
  2. FAPEMIG (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Many physiological responses of the Renin Angiotensin System (RAS) are associated with two opposite pathways: (1) a classical one formed by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), Angiotensin II (Ang II) and Angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor, which is associated to vasoconstriction, cell proliferation, organ hypertrophy, sodium retention and aldosterone release and (2) a counter-regulatory or vasodilator pathway comprising angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), Angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] and Mas receptor, which is involved in vasodilation, anti-proliferation, anti-hypertrophy, cardioprotective and renoprotective actions. Objective: This review aimed to bring up-to-date on the interactions between physical exercise and the vasodilator axis of the RAS (ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas receptor axis). We also investigated the relation of acute and chronic exercise with blood pressure regulation and components of the vasodilator axis of the RAS. Methods: We searched studies with animal models and humans in PUBMED, LILACS and IBECS. Results: Experimental studies showed that physical training can stimulate ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas receptor axis in parallel with the inhibition of ACE-Ang II-AT1 receptor pathway. However, up to now, the interaction between the counter-regulatory RAS axis and physical training is not investigated in humans. Conclusion: The activation of ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas receptor axis may have a role in the beneficial effects of physical training in experimental models. Further studies with humans are necessary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据