4.4 Article

Circulating Antioxidant Levels and Risk of Prostate Cancer by TMPRSS2:ERG

期刊

PROSTATE
卷 77, 期 6, 页码 647-653

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.23312

关键词

biomarkers; molecular subtypes; epidemiology

资金

  1. Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Prostate Cancer [P50 CA090381]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R25 CA112355, T32 CA09001, R01 CA136578, UM1CA167552]
  3. American Cancer Society -Ellison Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship [PF-14-140-01-CCE]
  4. Prostate Cancer Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDFew studies have considered etiological differences across molecular subtypes of prostate cancer, despite potential to improve opportunities for precision prevention of a disease for which modifiable risk factors have remained elusive. Factors that lead to DNA double-strand breaks, such as oxidative stress, may promote the formation of the TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion in prostate cancer. We tested the hypothesis that increasing levels of pre-diagnostic circulating antioxidants, which may reduce oxidative stress, are associated with lower risk of developing TMPRSS2:ERG positive prostate cancer. METHODSWe conducted a nested case-control study, including 370 cases and 2,470 controls, to evaluate associations between pre-diagnostic - and -carotene, - and -tocopherol, -cryptoxanthin, lutein, lycopene, retinol, and selenium with the risk of prostate cancer by ERG protein expression status (a marker of TMPRSS2:ERG). Multivariable unconditional polytomous logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTSWe did not find any of the antioxidants to be significantly associated with the risk of prostate cancer according to ERG status. CONCLUSIONSThe results do not support the hypothesis that circulating pre-diagnostic antioxidant levels protect against developing TMPRSS2:ERG positive prostate cancer. Additional studies are needed to explore mechanisms for the development of TMPRSS2:ERG positive disease. Prostate 77: 647-653, 2017. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据