4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

HIV/neuroAlDS biomarkers

期刊

PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 117-132

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.04.003

关键词

HIV/neuroAlDS; Biomarkers; CSF; Blood; Neuroimaging

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH/NINDS R01NS065785, NIH/NINDS R01NS094108, NIH/NIMH R01MH092673]
  2. Neurobiology of Aging Training Grant [T32 AG020494]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HIV infection often causes neurological symptoms including cognitive and motor dysfunction, which have been collectively termed HIV/neuroAlDS. Neuropsychological assessment and clinical symptoms have been the primary diagnostic criteria for HIV/neuroAlDS, even for the mild cognitive and motor disorder, the most prevalent form of HIV/neuroAlDS in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. Those performance-based assessments and symptoms are generally descriptive and do not have the sensitivity and specificity to monitor the diagnosis, progression, and treatment response of the disease when compared to objective and quantitative laboratory-based biological markers, or biomarkers. In addition, effects of demographics and comorbidities such as substance abuse, psychiatric disease, nutritional deficiencies, and co-infection on HIV/neuroAlDS could be more readily determined using biomarkers than using neuropsychological assessment and clinical symptoms. Thus, there have been great efforts in identification of HIV/neuroAlDS biomarkers over the past two decades. The need for reliable biomarkers of HIV/neuroAlDS is expected to increase as the HIV-infected population ages and their vulnerability to neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer's disease increases. Currently, three classes of HIV/neuroAlDS biomarkers are being pursued to establish objective laboratory-based definitions of HIV-associated neurologic injury: cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, blood biomarkers, and neuroimaging biomarkers. In this review, we will focus on the current knowledge in the field of HIV/neuroAlDS biomarker discovery. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据