4.6 Review

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR): pioneer member of the basic-helix/loop/helix per-Arnt-sim (bHLH/PAS) family of sensors of foreign and endogenous signals

期刊

PROGRESS IN LIPID RESEARCH
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 38-57

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2017.06.001

关键词

AHR; bHLH/PAS family of transcription factors; Cancer; Dose-response curve; Embryonic stem cells; Prostaglandins; Eicosanoids; Lipid mediators; Mouse genetics; Pro-inflammatory and post-inflammatory response; Brain-gut-microbiome

资金

  1. [R01 ES008147]
  2. [R01 ES014403]
  3. [P30 ES06096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The basic-helix/loop/helix per-Arnt-sim (bHLH/PAS) family comprises many transcription factors, found throughout all three kingdoms of life; bHLH/PAS members sense innumerable intracellular and extracellular signals - including endogenous compounds, foreign chemicals, gas molecules, redox potential, photons (light), gravity, heat, and osmotic pressure. These signals then initiate downstream signaling pathways involved in responding to that signal. The term PAS, abbreviation for per-Arnt-sim was first coined in 1991. Although the mouse Arnt gene was not identified until 1991, evidence of its co-transcriptional binding partner, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), was first reported in 1974 as a sensor of foreign chemicals, up-regulating cytochrome P450 family 1 (CYP1) and other enzyme activities that usually metabolize the signaling chemical. Within a few years, AHR was proposed also to participate in inflammation. The mouse [Ah] locus was shown (1973-1989) to be relevant to chemical carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, toxicity and teratogenesis, the mouse Ahr gene was cloned in 1992, and the first Ahr(-/-) knockout mouse line was reported in 1995. After thousands of studies from the early 1970s to present day, we now realize that AHR participates in dozens of signaling pathways involved in critical-life processes, affecting virtually every organ and cell-type in the animal, including many invertebrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据