4.6 Article

L-Lactic acid production from liquefied cassava starch by thermotolerant Rhizopus microsporus: Characterization and optimization

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 26-34

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2017.08.019

关键词

L-lactic acid; Cassava starch; Rhizopus microsporus; Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation; Thermotolerant

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee PhD Program and Kasetsart University [PHD/0148/2552]
  2. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI)
  3. Center for Advanced Studies in Tropical Natural Resources, National Research University-Kasetsart University (CASTNAR, NRU-KU)
  4. Cassava and Starch Technology Research Unit (CSTRU)
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  6. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT)
  7. Vietnam Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST)
  8. National University of Laos
  9. Beuth University of Applied Sciences (Berlin)
  10. Brawijaya University (Malang, Indonesia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermotolerant Rhizopus microsporus DMKU 33 capable of producing L-lactic acid from liquefied cassava starch was isolated and characterized for its phylogenetic relationship and growth temperature and pH ranges. The concentrations of (NH4)(2)SO4, ICH2PO4, MgSO4 and ZnSO4 center dot 7H(2)O in the fermentation medium was optimized for lactic acid production from liquefied cassava starch by Rhizopus microsporus DMKU 33 in shake -flasks at 40 degrees C. The fermentation was then studied in a stirred-tank bioreactor with aeration at 0.75 vvm and agitation at 200 rpm, achieving the highest lactic acid production of 84 g/L with a yield of 0.84 g/g at pH 5.5 in 3 days. Lactic acid production was further increased to 105-118 g/L with a yield of 0.93 g/g and productivity of 1.25 g/L/h in fed-batch fermentation. R. microsporus DMKU 33 is thus advantageous to use in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for L-lactic acid production from low-cost starchy substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据