4.5 Article

A pilot randomized controlled trial of on-line interventions to improve sleep quality in adults after mild or moderate traumatic brain injury

期刊

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 619-629

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269215517736671

关键词

Traumatic brain injury; sleep; cognitive behavioural therapy; education

资金

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand [14/598]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To explore feasibility and potential efficacy of on-line interventions for sleep quality following a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: A two parallel-group, randomized controlled pilot study. Setting: Community-based. Subjects: In all, 24 participants (mean age: 35.9 11.8 years) who reported experiencing sleep difficulties between 3 and 36 months after a mild or moderate TBI. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive either a cognitive behaviour therapy or an education intervention on-line. Both interventions were self-completed for 20-30 minutes per week over a six-week period. Main measures: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index assessed self-reported sleep quality with actigraphy used as an objective measure of sleep quality. The CNS Vital Signs on-line neuropsychological test assessed cognitive functioning and the Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms and Quality of Life after Brain Injury questionnaires were completed pre and post intervention. Results: Both programmes demonstrated feasibility for use post TBI, with 83.3% of participants completing the interventions. The cognitive behaviour therapy group experienced significant reductions (F = 5.47, p = 0.04) in sleep disturbance (mean individual change = -4.00) in comparison to controls post intervention (mean individual change = -1.50) with a moderate effect size of 1.17. There were no significant group differences on objective sleep quality, cognitive functioning, post-concussion symptoms or quality of life. Conclusion: On-line programmes designed to improve sleep are feasible for use for adults following mild-to-moderate TBI. Based on the effect size identified in this pilot study, 128 people (64 per group) would be needed to determine clinical effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据