4.7 Article

Coral calcifying fluid pH is modulated by seawater carbonate chemistry not solely seawater pH

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1669

关键词

calcification; protons; dissolved inorganic carbon; total alkalinity; ocean acidification

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OCE 10-41270, 14-15268]
  2. Government of the Principality of Monaco
  3. California State University, Northridge, Marine Biology (CSUN)
  4. ARC (Discovery Early Career Researcher Award) [DE160100668]
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1415268] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reef coral calcification depends on regulation of pH in the internal calcifying fluid (CF) in which the coral skeleton forms. However, little is known about calcifying fluid pH (pH(CF)) regulation, despite its importance in determining the response of corals to ocean acidification. Here, we investigate pHCF in the coral Stylophora pistillata in seawater maintained at constant pH with manipulated carbonate chemistry to alter dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration, and therefore total alkalinity (A(T)). We also investigate the intracellular pH of calcifying cells, photosynthesis, respiration and calcification rates under the same conditions. Our results show that despite constant pH in the surrounding seawater, pH(CF) is sensitive to shifts in carbonate chemistry associated with changes in [DIC] and [A(T)], revealing that seawater pH is not the sole driver of pH(CF). Notably, when we synthesize our results with published data, we identify linear relationships of pH(CF) with the seawater [DIC]/[H+] ratio, [A(T)]/ [H+] ratio and [CO32-]. Our findings contribute new insights into the mechanisms determining the sensitivity of coral calcification to changes in seawater carbonate chemistry, which are needed for predicting effects of environmental change on coral reefs and for robust interpretations of isotopic palaeoenvironmental records in coral skeletons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据