4.4 Article

Hygiene practices: Are they protective factors for eczema symptoms?

期刊

IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION AND DISEASE
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 297-306

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/iid3.217

关键词

Atopic dermatitis; eczema; epidermal barrier dysfunction; hygiene hypothesis; partial ablution

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control [MOHW105-CDC-C-114-122109]
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, R.O.C. [104G01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Exact etiology and proper treatment of eczema are still unknown. The hygiene hypothesis and epidermal barrier dysfunction hypothesis attempted to give some plausible explanations for these issues but they still remain unclear. The identification of factors, including hygiene practices, related to eczema symptoms (ES) could shed some light on these matters. Therefore, this study aimed to determine risk factors related to ES and the ES prevalence in two disparate areas in terms of urbanization in Aceh, Indonesia. Methods: A cross-sectional study with convenience sampling was conducted among schoolchildren living in urban and rural Aceh. Data on ES, socio-demographic characteristics, environmental factors, partial ablution and other hygiene related factors were collected by parental questionnaires. In addition, children's anthropometric measurements were also collected. Results: The prevalence of current ES in the study population was 21%. When stratifying by residency, the prevalence of ES in urban and rural area was 20.93% versus 21.05%. Partial ablution was independently associated with a reduced risk of ES (OR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.13-0.96). Important risk factors for ES were paternal history of allergic disease (OR = 4.09%; 95% CI 1.51-11.11) and belonging to the older group of schoolchildren (10-13 years old) (OR = 2.57; 95% CI 1.03-6.40). Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the prevalence of ES between urban and rural settings, and partial ablution had a protective effect on ES. These findings support the epidermal barrier dysfunction hypothesis as a possible pathway of eczema.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据