4.7 Article

Stable producer-scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2872

关键词

Parus major; producer-scrounger games; social network analysis; social learning; social foraging; animal personality

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biosciences Research Council [BB/L006081/1]
  2. junior research fellowship at St John's College, University of Oxford
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L006081/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/L006081/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There has been extensive game-theoretic modelling of conditions leading to equilibria of producer-scrounger dichotomies in groups. However there is a surprising paucity of experimental evidence in wild populations. Here, we examine producer-scrounger games in five subpopulations of birds feeding at a socially learnt foraging task. Over four weeks, a bimodal distribution of producers and scroungers emerged in all areas, with pronounced and consistent individual tactic specialization persisting over 3 years. Tactics were unrelated to exploratory personality, but correlated with latency to contact and learn the foraging task, with the late arrivers and slower learners more likely to adopt the scrounging role. Additionally, the social environment was also important: at the broad scale, larger subpopulations with a higher social density contained proportionally more scroungers, while within subpopulations scroungers tended to be central in the social network and be observed in larger foraging flocks. This study thus provides a rare example of a stable, dimorphic distribution of producer-scrounger tactics in a wild population. It further gives support across multiple scales for a major prediction of social foraging theory; that the frequency of scroungers increases with group size.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据