4.5 Article

Fluid flow in porous media using image-based modelling to parametrize Richards' equation

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2017.0178

关键词

image-based modelling; porous media; Richards' equation

资金

  1. BBSRC SARISA [BB/L025620/1]
  2. ERC [646809DIMR]
  3. BBSRC [BB/J00868/1]
  4. Scottish Government
  5. EPSRC [EP/M020355/1]
  6. BBSRC SARIC [BB/P004180/1]
  7. NERC [NE/L00237/1]
  8. [BB/L025825/1]
  9. BBSRC [BB/L026058/1, BB/L025825/1, BB/J000868/1, BB/J011460/1, BB/L025620/1, BB/P004180/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. NERC [NE/L000237/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L026058/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The parameters in Richards' equation are usually calculated from experimentally measured values of the soil-water characteristic curve and saturated hydraulic conductivity. The complex pore structures that often occur in porous media complicate such parametrization due to hysteresis between wetting and drying and the effects of tortuosity. Rather than estimate the parameters in Richards' equation from these indirect measurements, image-based modelling is used to investigate the relationship between the pore structure and the parameters. A three-dimensional, X-ray computed tomography image stack of a soil sample with voxel resolution of 6 mu m has been used to create a computational mesh. The Cahn-Hilliard-Stokes equations for two-fluid flow, in this case water and air, were applied to this mesh and solved using the finite-element method in COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS. The upscaled parameters in Richards' equation are then obtained via homogenization. The effect on the soil-water retention curve due to three different contact angles, 0 degrees, 20 degrees and 60 degrees, was also investigated. The results show that the pore structure affects the properties of the flow on the large scale, and different contact angles can change the parameters for Richards' equation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据