4.5 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Finite-element modelling of elastic wave propagation and scattering within heterogeneous media (Retracted Article)

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2016.0738

关键词

elastodynamics; wave scattering; stochastic finite elements; heterogeneous media

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. AFRL (USA) [FA865010-D-5210]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K034332/1, EP/L022125/1, EP/F017332/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K034332/1, EP/F017332/1, EP/L022125/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The scattering treated here arises when elastic waves propagate within a heterogeneous medium defined by random spatial fluctuation of its elastic properties. Whereas classical analytical studies are based on lower-order scattering assumptions, numerical methods conversely present no such limitations by inherently incorporating multiple scattering. Until now, studies have typically been limited to two or one dimension, however, owing to computational constraints. This article seizes recent advances to realize a finite-element formulation that solves the three-dimensional elastodynamic scattering problem. The developed methodology enables the fundamental behaviour of scattering in terms of attenuation and dispersion to be studied. In particular, the example of elastic waves propagating within polycrystalline materials is adopted, using Voronoi tessellations to randomly generate representative models. The numerically observed scattering is compared against entirely independent but well-established analytical scattering theory. The quantitative agreement is found to be excellent across previously unvisited scattering regimes; it is believed that this is the first quantitative validation of its kind which provides significant support towards the existence of the transitional scattering regime and facilitates future deployment of numerical methods for these problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据