4.0 Article

Effect of obesity on oxygen uptake and cardiovascular dynamics during whole-body and leg exercise in adult males and females

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13705

关键词

Muscle vasodilation; O-2 uptake; obesity; submaximal exercise; time constant

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [08/RFP/BMT1342]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [08/RFP/BMT1342] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity has been associated with a slowing of VO2 dynamics in children and adolescents, but this problem has not been studied in adults. Cardiovascular mechanisms underlying this effect are not clear. In this study, 48 adults (18 males, 30 females) grouped according to body mass index (BMI) (lean<25 kgm(-2), overweight=25-29.9 kgm(-2), obese >= 30 kgm(-2)) provided a fasting blood sample, completed a maximal graded exercise test and six bouts of submaximal exercise on a cycle ergometer, and performed two protocols of calf exercise. Dynamic response characteristics of VO2 and leg vascular conductance (LVC) were assessed during cycling (80% ventilatory threshold) and calf exercise (30% MVC), respectively. Dynamic responses of cardiac output, mean arterial pressure and total systemic vascular conductance were also assessed during cycling based on measurements at 30 and 240sec. The time constant of the second phase of the VO2 response was significantly greater in obese than lean subjects (39.4 (9.2) vs. 29.1 (7.6) sec); whereas dynamic responses of cardiac output and systemic vascular conductance were not affected by BMI. For calf exercise, the time constant of the second growth phase of LVC was slowed significantly in obese subjects (22.1 (12.7) sec) compared with lean and overweight subjects (11.6 (4.5) sec and 13.4 (6.7) sec). These data show that obesity slows dynamic responses of VO2 during cycling and the slower phase of vasodilation in contracting muscles of male and female adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据