4.6 Article

Tau Derived Hexapeptide AcPHF6 Promotes Beta-Amyloid (Aβ) Fibrillogenesis

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 773-782

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00433

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; beta-amyloid; hexapeptide; aggregation kinetics; transmission electron microscopy; neuroprotection; molecular docking

资金

  1. Ontario Mental Health Foundation
  2. NSERC-Discovery (RGPIN) [03830-2014]
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI-JELF)
  4. Ontario Research Fund (ORF)
  5. Early Researcher Award (ERA)
  6. Ministry of Research and Innovation, Government of Ontario (P.P.N.R), Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the interactions of a tau derived hexapeptide AcPHF6 with beta-amyloid peptides A beta 40 and A beta 42 which reveals its unusual ability to promote A beta fibrillogenesis. The results demonstrate that the N-acetylated and C-amidated AcPHF6 hexapeptide can cause significant acceleration in A beta 40 and A beta 42 fibril growth. Aggregation kinetic studies at pH 7.4 show that at 25 mu M, AcPHF6 hexapeptide was able to cause similar to 2.3-fold increase in A beta 40 fibrillogenesis dramatically changing the aggregation kinetics. In addition, AcPHF6 peptide was able to reduce cellular toxicity mediated by A beta 40 and A beta 42 in hippocampal neuronal cell line (HT22). Computational studies suggest that the AcPHF6 peptide can act as an anchor and provides a hydrophobic surface for A beta monomer to bind and undergo rapid fibrillogenesis to form less toxic fibrils and alter the aggregation kinetics. At the molecular level we propose a dock-and-pack mechanism where the AcPHF6 hexapeptide aggregates can stabilize the beta-hairpin and promote rapid A beta self-assembly and growth to form less toxic oligomers or fibrils. Our results have direct implications in designing novel peptide/peptidomimetics as novel pharmacological tools to study protein aggregation and potentially prevent A beta-mediated toxicity in Alzheimer's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据