4.8 Article

Mechanochemical feedback underlies coexistence of qualitatively distinct cell polarity patterns within diverse cell populations

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700054114

关键词

cell polarization; cell migration; mechanochemical feedback; Rho-family small GTPases; extracellular matrix

资金

  1. Samsung scholarship
  2. NIH [U54 CA209992, U01 CA155758]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-41870]
  4. NSF [DMS-1562078]
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1562078] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell polarization and directional cell migration can display random, persistent, and oscillatory dynamic patterns. However, it is not clear whether these polarity patterns can be explained by the same underlying regulatory mechanism. Here, we show that random, persistent, and oscillatory migration accompanied by polarization can simultaneously occur in populations of melanoma cells derived from tumors with different degrees of aggressiveness. We demonstrate that all of these patterns and the probabilities of their occurrence are quantitatively accounted for by a simple mechanism involving a spatially distributed, mechanochemical feedback coupling the dynamically changing extracellular matrix (ECM)-cell contacts to the activation of signaling downstream of the Rho-family small GTPases. This mechanism is supported by a predictive mathematical model and extensive experimental validation, and can explain previously reported results for diverse cell types. In melanoma, this mechanism also accounts for the effects of genetic and environmental perturbations, including mutations linked to invasive cell spread. The resulting mechanistic understanding of cell polarity quantitatively captures the relationship between population variability and phenotypic plasticity, with the potential to account for a wide variety of cell migration states in diverse pathological and physiological conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据