4.8 Article

Redox chemistry changes in the Panthalassic Ocean linked to the end-Permian mass extinction and delayed Early Triassic biotic recovery

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1610931114

关键词

end-Permian mass extinction; Panthalassic Ocean; multiple sulfur; isotopes; sulfidic waters

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41330102, 41520104007]
  2. 111 Project
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The end-Permian mass extinction represents the most severe biotic crisis for the last 540 million years, and the marine ecosystem recovery from this extinction was protracted, spanning the entirety of the Early Triassic and possibly longer. Numerous studies from the low-latitude Paleotethys and high-latitude Boreal oceans have examined the possible link between ocean chemistry changes and the end-Permian mass extinction. However, redox chemistry changes in the Panthalassic Ocean, comprising similar to 85-90% of the global ocean area, remain under debate. Here, we report multiple S-isotopic data of pyrite from Upper Permian-Lower Triassic deepsea sediments of the Panthalassic Ocean, nowpresent in outcrops of western Canada and Japan. We find a sulfur isotope signal of negative. Delta S-33 with either positive delta S-34 or negative delta S-34 that implies mixing of sulfide sulfur with different delta S-34 before, during, and after the end-Permian mass extinction. The precise coincidence of the negative. Delta S-33 anomaly with the extinction horizon in western Canada suggests that shoaling of H2S-rich waters may have driven the end-Permian mass extinction. Our data also imply episodic euxinia and oscillations between sulfidic and oxic conditions during the earliest Triassic, providing evidence of a causal link between incursion of sulfidic waters and the delayed recovery of the marine ecosystem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据