4.8 Article

Targeting IRE1 with small molecules counteracts progression of atherosclerosis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1621188114

关键词

endoplasmic reticulum stress; unfolded protein response; metaflammation; lipotoxicity; atherosclerosis

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [110S293]
  2. TUBITAK [113Z023]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [336643]
  4. Cancer Research Institute
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [336643] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metaflammation, an atypical, metabolically induced, chronic low-grade inflammation, plays an important role in the development of obesity, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. An important primer for metaflammation is the persistent metabolic overloading of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), leading to its functional impairment. Activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), a homeostatic regulatory network that responds to ER stress, is a hallmark of all stages of atherosclerotic plaque formation. The most conserved ER-resident UPR regulator, the kinase/endoribonuclease inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), is activated in lipid-laden macrophages that infiltrate the atherosclerotic lesions. Using RNA sequencing in macrophages, we discovered that IRE1 regulates the expression of many proatherogenic genes, including several important cytokines and chemokines. We show that IRE1 inhibitors uncouple lipid-induced ER stress from inflammasome activation in both mouse and human macrophages. In vivo, these IRE1 inhibitors led to a significant decrease in hyperlipidemia-induced IL-1 beta and IL-18 production, lowered T-helper type-1 immune responses, and reduced atherosclerotic plaque size without altering the plasma lipid profiles in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. These results show that pharmacologic modulation of IRE1 counteracts metaflammation and alleviates atherosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据