4.8 Article

Assembly of silver Trigons into a buckyball-like Ag180 nanocage

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711972114

关键词

supramolecular chemistry; coordination assembly; symmetry; silver cage; Goldberg cage

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21571115, 21227001, 21701133]
  2. Shandong University [2015WLJH24, 104.205.2.5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Buckminsterfullerene (C-60) represents a perfect combination of geometry and molecular structural chemistry. It has inspired many creative ideas for building fullerene-like nanopolyhedra. These include other fullerenes, virus capsids, polyhedra based on DNA, and synthetic polynuclear metal clusters and cages. Indeed, the regular organization of large numbers of metal atoms into one highly complex structure remains one of the foremost challenges in supramolecular chemistry. Here we describe the design, synthesis, and characterization of a Ag-180 nanocage with 180 Ag atoms as 4-valent vertices (V), 360 edges (E), and 182 faces (F)-sixty 3-gons, ninety 4-gons, twelve 5-gons, and twenty 6-gons-in agreement with Euler's rule V - E + F = 2. If each 3-gon (or silver Trigon) were replaced with a carbon atom linked by edges along the 4-gons, the result would be like C-60, topologically a truncated icosahedron, an Archimedean solid with icosahedral (I-h) point-group symmetry. If C60 can be described mathematically as a curling up of a 6.6.6 Platonic tiling, the Ag180 cage can be described as a curling up of a 3.4.6.4 Archimedean tiling. High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry reveals that {Ag-3}(n) subunits coexist with the Ag-180 species in the assembly system before the final crystallization of Ag-180, suggesting that the silver Trigon is the smallest building block in assembly of the final cage. Thus, we assign the underlying growth mechanism of Ag-180 to the Silver-Trigon Assembly Road (STAR), an assembly path that might be further employed to fabricate larger, elegant silver cages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据