4.7 Article

Global-change effects on early-stage decomposition processes in tidal wetlands - implications from a global survey using standardized litter

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 3189-3202

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-15-3189-2018

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bauer-Hollmann Stiftung
  2. Rudolf und Helene Glaser Stiftung
  3. International Affairs, Strategy and Partnership office of Universitat Hamburg
  4. NSF [DEB-1354124, DEB-1719621]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tidal wetlands, such as tidal marshes and mangroves, are hotspots for carbon sequestration. The preservation of organic matter (OM) is a critical process by which tidal wetlands exert influence over the global carbon cycle and at the same time gain elevation to keep pace with sealevel rise (SLR). The present study assessed the effects of temperature and relative sea level on the decomposition rate and stabilization of OM in tidal wetlands worldwide, utilizing commercially available standardized litter. While effects on decomposition rate per se were minor, we show strong negative effects of temperature and relative sea level on stabilization, as based on the fraction of labile, rapidly hydrolyzable OM that becomes stabilized during deployment. Across study sites, OM stabilization was 29 % lower in low, more frequently flooded vs. high, less frequently flooded zones. Stabilization declined by similar to 75% over the studied temperature gradient from 10.9 to 28.5 degrees C. Additionally, data from the Plum Island long-term ecological research site in Mas- sachusetts, USA, show a pronounced reduction in OM stabilization by > 70 % in response to simulated coastal eutrophication, confirming the potentially high sensitivity of OM stabilization to global change. We therefore provide evidence that rising temperature, accelerated SLR, and coastal eutrophication may decrease the future capacity of tidal wetlands to sequester carbon by affecting the initial transformations of recent OM inputs to soil OM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据