4.8 Article

High-capacity, low-tortuosity, and channel-guided lithium metal anode

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1618871114

关键词

lithium metal batteries; wood channels; low tortuosity; stable cycling; high capacity

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy Project [DE-AR 0000726]
  2. Nanostructures for Electrical Energy Storage, an Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DESC0001160]
  3. China Scholarship Council [CSC 201506680044]
  4. Key Laboratory of Superlight Materials and Surface Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium metal anode with the highest capacity and lowest anode potential is extremely attractive to battery technologies, but infinite volume change during the Li stripping/plating process results in cracks and fractures of the solid electrolyte interphase, low Coulombic efficiency, and dendritic growth of Li. Here, we use a carbonized wood (C-wood) as a 3D, highly porous (73% porosity) conductive framework with well-aligned channels as Li host material. We discovered that molten Li metal can infuse into the straight channels of C-wood to form a Li/C-wood electrode after surface treatment. The C-wood channels function as excellent guides in which the Li stripping/plating process can take place and effectively confine the volume change that occurs. Moreover, the local current density can be minimized due to the 3D C-wood framework. Therefore, in symmetric cells, the as-prepared Li/C-wood electrode presents a lower over-potential (90 mV at 3 mA.cm(-2)), more-stable stripping/plating profiles, and better cycling performance (similar to 150 h at 3 mA.cm(-2)) compared with bare Li metal electrode. Our findings may open up a solution for fabricating stable Li metal anode, which further facilitates future application of high-energy-density Li metal batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据