4.8 Article

Mesoscale martensitic transformation in single crystals of topological defects

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711207114

关键词

blue phase; chiral liquid crystals; self-assembly; chemical patterns; martensitic transformation

资金

  1. the US Department of Energy (DOE), Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  2. DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1420709]
  4. Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion [110-165-843-748]
  5. El Patrimonio Autonomo Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento para la Ciencia, la Tecnologia y la Innovacion Francisco Jose de Caldas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid-crystal blue phases (BPs) are highly ordered at two levels. Molecules exhibit orientational order at nanometer length scales, while chirality leads to ordered arrays of double-twisted cylinders over micrometer scales. Past studies of polycrystalline BPs were challenged by the existence of grain boundaries between randomly oriented crystalline nanodomains. Here, the nucleation of BPs is controlled with precision by relying on chemically nanopatterned surfaces, leading to macroscopic single-crystal BP specimens where the dynamics of mesocrystal formation can be directly observed. Theory and experiments show that transitions between two BPs having a different network structure proceed through local reorganization of the crystalline array, without diffusion of the double-twisted cylinders. In solid crystals, martensitic transformations between crystal structures involve the concerted motion of a few atoms, without diffusion. The transformation between BPs, where crystal features arise in the submicron regime, is found to be martensitic in nature when one considers the collective behavior of the double-twist cylinders. Single-crystal BPs are shown to offer fertile grounds for the study of directed crystal nucleation and the controlled growth of soft matter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据