4.8 Article

Electron localization in rod-shaped triicosahedral gold nanocluster

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1704699114

关键词

cluster; electron dynamics; electron localization; temperature dependence

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [FA9550-15-1-9999 (FA9550-15-1-0154)]
  2. Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Awards Program
  3. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atomically precise gold nanocluster based on linear assembly of repeating icosahedrons (clusters of clusters) is a unique type of linear nanostructure, which exhibits strong near-infrared absorption as their free electrons are confined in a one-dimensional quantum box. Little is known about the carrier dynamics in these nanoclusters, which limit their energy-related applications. Here, we reported the observation of exciton localization in triicosahedral Au-37 nanoclusters (0.5 nm in diameter and 1.6 nm in length) by measuring femtosecond and nanosecond carrier dynamics. Upon photoexcitation to S-1 electronic state, electrons in Au37 undergo similar to 100-ps localization from the two vertexes of three icosahedrons to one vertex, forming a long-lived S-1* state. Such phenomenon is not observed in Au-25 (dimer) and Au-13 (monomer) consisting of two and one icosahedrons, respectively. We have further observed temperature dependence on the localization process, which proves it is thermally driven. Two excited-state vibration modes with frequencies of 20 and 70 cm(-1) observed in the kinetic traces are assigned to the axial and radial breathing modes, respectively. The electron localization is ascribed to the structural distortion of Au37 in the excited state induced by the strong coherent vibrations. The observed electron localization phenomenon provides unique physical insight into one-dimensional gold nanoclusters and other nanostructures, which will advance their applications in solar-energy storage and conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据