4.8 Article

Transfer of pathogenic and nonpathogenic cytosolic proteins between spinal cord motor neurons in vivo in chimeric mice

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701465114

关键词

ALS; oligodendrocytes; cranial nerves; aggregates; SOD1

资金

  1. Biogen
  2. Ellison Medical Research Foundation
  3. NIH Medical Science Training Program grant
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have reported spread of pathogenic proteins in the mammalian nervous system, but whether nonpathogenic ones spread is unknown. We initially investigated whether spread of a mutant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-associated cytosolic superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) protein between motor neurons could be detected in intact chimeric mice. Eight-cell embryos from G85R SOD1YFP and G85R SOD1CFP mice were aggregated, and spinal cords of adult chimeric progeny were examined for motor neurons with cytosolic double fluorescence. By 3mo of age, we observed extensive double fluorescence, including in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-affected cranial nerve motor nuclei but not in the relatively spared extraocular nuclei. Chimeras of nonpathogenic wtSOD1YFP and G85R SOD1CFP also exhibited double fluorescence. In a third chimera, mitochondrial mCherry did not transfer to G85R SOD1YFP motor neurons, suggesting that neither RNA nor organelles transfer, but mito-mCherry neurons received G85R SOD1YFP. In a chimera of ChAT promoter-EGFP and mito-mCherry, EGFP efficiently transferred to mito-mCherry+ cells. Thus, nonpathogenic cytosolic proteins appear capable of transfer. During study of both the SOD1FP and EGFP chimeras, we observed fluorescence also in small cells neighboring the motor neurons, identified as mature gray matter oligodendrocytes. Double fluorescence in the G85R SOD1FP chimera and observation of the temporal development of fluorescence first in motor neurons and then in these oligodendrocytes suggest that they may be mediators of transfer of cytosolic proteins between motor neurons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据