4.8 Article

Comparative genomics uncovers the prolific and distinctive metabolic potential of the cyanobacterial genus Moorea

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1618556114

关键词

tropical marine cyanobacteria; genome comparison; biosynthetic gene clusters; heterocyst glycolipids; gene cluster network

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA108874, GM107550]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [14-50-00069]
  3. CAPES Foundation [13425-13-7]
  4. Russian Science Foundation [14-50-00069] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyanobacteria are major sources of oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon in nature. In addition to the importance of their primary metabolism, some cyanobacteria are prolific producers of unique and bioactive secondary metabolites. Chemical investigations of the cyanobacterial genus Moorea have resulted in the isolation of over 190 compounds in the last two decades. However, preliminary genomic analysis has suggested that genome-guided approaches can enable the discovery of novel compounds from even well-studied Moorea strains, highlighting the importance of obtaining complete genomes. We report a complete genome of a filamentous tropical marine cyanobacterium, Moorea producens PAL, which reveals that about one-fifth of its genome is devoted to production of secondary metabolites, an impressive four times the cyanobacterial average. Moreover, possession of the complete PAL genome has allowed improvement to the assembly of three other Moorea draft genomes. Comparative genomics revealed that they are remarkably similar to one another, despite their differences in geography, morphology, and secondary metabolite profiles. Gene cluster networking highlights that this genus is distinctive among cyanobacteria, not only in the number of secondary metabolite pathways but also in the content of many pathways, which are potentially distinct from all other bacterial gene clusters to date. These findings portend that future genome-guided secondary metabolite discovery and isolation efforts should be highly productive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据