4.8 Article

Farming and public goods production in Caenorhabditis elegans populations

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1608961114

关键词

foraging behavior; public goods; predator-prey; population dynamics; farming

资金

  1. NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [P40 OD010440]
  2. Human Frontier Science Program (Cross Disciplinary Fellowship)
  3. NIH Director's New Innovator Award [1DP2GM105437-01]
  4. Searle Scholars Program Grant [12-SSP-217]
  5. Simons Foundation Grant [395890]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ecological and evolutionary dynamics of populations are shaped by the strategies they use to produce and use resources. However, our understanding of the interplay between the genetic, behavioral, and environmental factors driving these strategies is limited. Here, we report on a Caenorhabditis elegans-Escherichia coli (worm-bacteria) experimental system in which the worm- foraging behavior leads to a redistribution of the bacterial food source, resulting in a growth advantage for both organisms, similar to that achieved via farming. We show experimentally and theoretically that the increased resource growth represents a public good that can benefit all other consumers, regardless of whether or not they are producers. Mutant worms that cannot farm bacteria benefit from farming by other worms in direct proportion to the fraction of farmers in the worm population. The farming behavior can therefore be exploited if it is associated with either energetic or survival costs. However, when the individuals compete for resources with their own type, these costs can result in an increased population density. Altogether, our findings reveal a previously unrecognized mechanism of public good production resulting from the foraging behavior of C. elegans, which has important population-level consequences. This powerful system may provide broad insight into explorationexploitation tradeoffs, the resultant ecoevolutionary dynamics, and the underlying genetic and neurobehavioral driving forces of multispecies interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据