4.8 Article

Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708727114

关键词

coronavirus; fusion proteins; proteolytic activation; cryoEM; membrane fusion

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [1R01GM120553, T32GM008268]
  2. Pew Scholars Award
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research Award Rubicon [019.2015.2.310.006]
  4. European Molecular Biology Organization Grant ALTF [933-2015]
  5. Pasteur Institute
  6. National Institute of Health [1S10RR23057, 1S10OD018111, 1U24GM116792]
  7. National Science Foundation [DBI-1338135]
  8. University of Washington [UWPR95794]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tremendous pandemic potential of coronaviruses was demonstrated twice in the past few decades by two global outbreaks of deadly pneumonia. The coronavirus spike (S) glycoprotein initiates infection by promoting fusion of the viral and cellular membranes through conformational changes that remain largely uncharacterized. Here we report the cryoEM structure of a coronavirus S glycoprotein in the postfusion state, showing large-scale secondary, tertiary, and quaternary rearrangements compared with the prefusion trimer and rationalizing the free-energy landscape of this conformational machine. We also biochemically characterized the molecular events associated with refolding of the metastable prefusion S glycoprotein to the postfusion conformation using limited proteolysis, mass spectrometry, and single-particle EM. The observed similarity between postfusion coronavirus S and paramyxovirus F structures demonstrates that a conserved refolding trajectory mediates entry of these viruses and supports the evolutionary relatedness of their fusion subunits. Finally, our data provide a structural framework for understanding the mode of neutralization of antibodies targeting the fusion machinery and for engineering nextgeneration subunit vaccines or inhibitors against this medically important virus family.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据