4.8 Article

Increasing atmospheric humidity and CO2 concentration alleviate forest mortality risk

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1704811114

关键词

forest mortality; drought; climate change; hydraulic failure; stomatal closure

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [EAR-1454983]
  2. NSF [EAR-1331846, DGE-1068871, EAR-1316258, FESD EAR-1338694, EAR-134470, DEB-1557176]
  3. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0011461]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0011461] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences [1331846, 1344703] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate-induced forest mortality is being increasingly observed throughout the globe. Alarmingly, it is expected to exacerbate under climate change due to shifting precipitation patterns and rising air temperature. However, the impact of concomitant changes in atmospheric humidity and CO2 concentration through their influence on stomatal kinetics remains a subject of debate and inquiry. By using a dynamic soil-plant-atmosphere model, mortality risks associated with hydraulic failure and stomatal closure for 13 temperate and tropical forest biomes across the globe are analyzed. The mortality risk is evaluated in response to both individual and combined changes in precipitation amounts and their seasonal distribution, mean air temperature, specific humidity, and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Model results show that the risk is predicted to significantly increase due to changes in precipitation and air temperature regime for the period 2050-2069. However, this increase may largely get alleviated by concurrent increases in atmospheric specific humidity and CO2 concentration. The increase in mortality risk is expected to be higher for needle-leaf forests than for broadleaf forests, as a result of disparity in hydraulic traits. These findings will facilitate decisions about intervention and management of different forest types under changing climate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据