4.8 Article

Cross-talk between topological defects in different fields revealed by nematic microfluidics

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702777114

关键词

multifield topology; nematic liquid crystals; topological defects; microfluidics; cross-interactions

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  2. Slovenian Research Agency [J1-7300, L1-8135, P1-0099]
  3. US Air Force Office of Scientific Research, European Office of Aerospace Research and Development [FA9550-15-1-0418, 15IOE028]
  4. Human Frontier Science Program [LT000993/2014-C]
  5. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topological defects are singularities in material fields that play a vital role across a range of systems: from cosmic microwave background polarization to superconductors and biological materials. Although topological defects and their mutual interactions have been extensively studied, little is known about the interplay between defects in different fields-especially when they coevolve-within the same physical system. Here, using nematic microfluidics, we study the cross-talk of topological defects in two different material fields-the velocity field and the molecular orientational field. Specifically, we generate hydrodynamic stagnation points of different topological charges at the center of star-shaped microfluidic junctions, which then interact with emergent topological defects in the orientational field of the nematic director. We combine experiments and analytical and numerical calculations to show that a hydrodynamic singularity of a given topological charge can nucleate a nematic defect of equal topological charge and corroborate this by creating -1, -2, and -3 topological defects in four-, six-, and eight-arm junctions. Our work is an attempt toward understanding materials that are governed by distinctly multifield topology, where disparate topology-carrying fields are coupled and concertedly determine the material properties and response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据