4.8 Article

Continuous production of stretchable conductive multifilaments in kilometer scale enables facile knitting of wearable strain sensing textiles

期刊

APPLIED MATERIALS TODAY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 255-263

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.02.012

关键词

Strain sensors; Conductive elastomeric fibers; Knitted textiles; Wet-spinning

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [FT130100380, IH140100018, DP170102859]
  2. Institute for Frontier Materials (Impact Grant Scheme)
  3. Deakin University
  4. Australian Research Council [FT130100380] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile large scale production of conductive and elastomeric fibers can enable the fabrication of functional fabrics for diverse applications including sensing for wearable and industrial textiles. Strain sensing textiles are gaining particular attention because of their increasing relevance in the development of smart devices for health, sports, and soft robotics. Current approaches to make sensing textiles rely on mounting a sensor or coating a sensing material onto existing fabrics. Here, we demonstrate the production of conductive elastomeric multifilaments in kilometer scale, which enables the facile knitting of textile prototypes that can detect large strains (up to 200%) with high stability (up to 500 cyclic stretching). Five different knit prototypes are fabricated to demonstrate that strain sensing behavior can be tailored using simple alterations in the loop configurations and stitch insertions in the knit structures. Strain sensing textiles that can be worn directly on various body parts (i.e. knee, elbow, and finger) without the need for any supporting structures or frames and can monitor diverse movements such as bending and kicking are demonstrated. This work provides scalable approaches for the fabrication of conductive elastomeric fibers and textiles that can be used for a wide range of sensing applications. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据