4.6 Article

A review of Backward-Facing Step (BFS) flow mechanisms, heat transfer and control

期刊

THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 194-216

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2018.04.004

关键词

Backward-Facing Step; Separation flow; Reattachment; Heat transfer; Flow control

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [16F16068]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51476080]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16F16068] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backward-Facing Step (BFS) flow is one representative model for separation flows, which can be widely seen in aerodynamic flows (airfoil, spoiler, high attack angle process), engine flows, condensers, vehicles (cars, boat), heat transfer systems, and even the flow around buildings, etc. The flow separation after a simple stage will introduce separation bubble formation, evolution and re-attachment process, which is dependent on the BFS geometric design, the inlet and outlet conditions, turbulent intensity, as well as heat transfer conditions. In the past decades, it has been widely studied by various theoretical, experimental and numerical methods. Considering the importance of BFS flow in both theoretical and engineering aspects, this paper is focused on a review study of BFS flows from fundamental understandings to various experimental and numerical developments in a historical viewpoint. Basic models and the parameter-based after-step flow laws are summarized and categorized in this study. It is shown that the step size (duct expansion ratio) will define the basic re-circulation and re-attachment process, while the coupled effects of inflow parameters and the perturbation designs also help shape the flow behaviors after BFS. The review is also extended with model generalizations and the implications on system design, especially the heat transfer effects and the representative control designs are discussed in detail. Future trends and prospects in BFS studies are also included in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据