4.5 Article

Interactions between sunlight and microorganisms influence dissolved organic matter degradation along the aquatic continuum

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY LETTERS
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 102-116

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lol2.10060

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [CAREER-1351745, DEB-1026843, 1637459, 1147336, PLR-1504006, 1504006]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences [1147336] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1351745] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1147336] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1347042] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1026843] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  11. Directorate For Geosciences [1504006] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CO2 emissions from inland surface waters to the atmosphere are almost as large as the net carbon transfer from the atmosphere to Earth's land surface. This large flux is supported by dissolved organic matter (DOM) from land and its complete oxidation to CO2 in freshwaters. A critical nexus in the global carbon cycle is the fate of DOM, either complete or partial oxidation. Interactions between sunlight and microbes control DOM degradation, but the relative importance of photodegradation vs. degradation by microbes is poorly known. The knowledge gaps required to advance understanding of key interactions between photochemistry and biology influencing DOM degradation include: (1) the efficiencies and products of DOM photodegradation, (2) how do photo-products control microbial metabolism of photo-altered DOM and on what time scales, and (3) how do water and DOM residence times and light exposure interact to determine the fate of DOM moving across the landscape to oceans?

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据