4.6 Article

Supersonic combustion of hydrocarbons in a shape-transitioning hypersonic engine

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 2883-2891

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.081

关键词

Scramjet; Surrogate fuel; Hydrocarbon; Supersonic combustion

资金

  1. AOARD [FA2386-13-1-4060]
  2. Australian Government through the Australian Postgraduate Award (APA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the results of a series of shock tunnel experiments of a hydrocarbon-fuelled, Mach 8 shape-transitioning scramjet engine with a cavity combustor. The inlet of the scramjet transitions from a quasi-rectangular capture area to an elliptical throat, which results in a highly three-dimensional flowfield at the combustor entrance. The main focus of the work was to achieve ignition and combustion of hydrocarbon fuels at a high Mach number in a flight-candidate engine that has the necessary three dimensional flow path that is typical of practical scramjet engines. The engine was fuelled with a surrogate fuel mixture (64% ethylene and 36% methane by volume) which mimics the extinguishing characteristics of partially cracked JP-7 fuel. Experiments were performed with and without a hydrogen-pilot to demonstrate ignition and combustion. Static pressure measurements throughout the flow path were used in conjunction with experiments where combustion was suppressed, by using nitrogen instead of air as the main flow, to confirm a combustion-induced pressure rise for different injection and piloting strategies. Ignition and supersonic combustion of the surrogate fuel mixture was achieved in all cases where a hydrogen pilot was employed. The pilot hydrogen fuel was injected at the inlet of the engine. Simultaneous injection of the surrogate fuel mixture at the inlet and in the combustor (combined injection) and combustor-only injection did not achieve combustion. (C) 2016 by The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据