4.6 Article

Effect of different pretreatments on the thermal degradation of seaweed biomass

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 2271-2281

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.086

关键词

Seaweed biomass; Pretreatment; Pyrolysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds Fund of China [51306078, 51676091]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560401]
  3. Postdoctoral Research Funding Scheme of Jiangsu Province, China [1402217C]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2014A020217008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the pyrolysis characteristics of seaweed biomass (Enteromorpha) after water-washed and acid-washed (7%, 10% of hydrochloric acid, 7% of sulfuric acid, 7% of phosphoric acid) pretreatments. These pretreatments of seaweed were signifi after water-washed and acid-washed (7%, 10, Ca, Na and Mg metals. Among these pretreatments the removal capacity of H2SO4 was the most obvious. The pyrolysis behaviors of materials after pretreatments have been studied using thermogravimetry-mass spectroscopy. During the pretreatments, O-H, C-O/C-H, S=O and C=O functional groups in Enteromorpha were cleaved. Phosphoric acid and hydrochloric acid made the intensities of the absorption peaks of O-H and S=O de-crease the most obvious, respectively. Therefore, there was almost no NO2 and SO2 emission in the process of pyrolysis of Enteromorpha washed by hydrochloric acid and phosphoric acid. The volatile components of Enteromorpha were easy to evolve after the pretreatment. Sulfuric acid exhibited the best efficiency in the process of pyrolysis, and it manifested smaller influence on other volatile organics simultaneously. However, the maximum weight loss rate and the corresponding temperature reduced after pretreatments, and the max-imum weight loss rate reduced more distinctly after 7% hydrochloric acid treatment. These results suggest that selective acid pretreatment would facilitate the thermal conversion of seaweed biomass. (C) 2016 by The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据