4.6 Article

Computed electronic structure of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon agglomerates

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 957-964

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.186

关键词

Soot; Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; Optical band gap; Density functional theory; Electronic structure

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CBET-0828950, CBET-1142284]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A technique for linking the physical composition of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) stacks and clusters to their electronic properties is reported. Kohn-Sham HOMO-LUMO gaps are reported for a series of monomers, stacks, and clusters of six, high-symmetry PAHs (pyrene, coronene, ovalene, circumpyrene, circumcoronene, and circumovalene) generated by DFT calculations with the 6-31G* basis set and a B3LYP exchange correlation functional in NWChem. A previously published, atom-pair minimization algorithm was used to optimize the geometries of the PAH stacks and clusters. HOMO-LUMO gaps decrease with an increase in monomer size; homogeneous stacks and clusters indicate substantial lowering of the HOMOLUMO gap because of agglomeration effects with the formation of dimers and formation of clusters (two or more stacks) being the most dominant contributions. Heteromolecular particulates had HOMO-LUMO gaps that were strongly influenced by the larger components in the system. The HOMO-LUMO gaps of homogeneous clusters approached a maximum agglomeration effect because of the localization of electronic interactions among adjacent stacks. Previously published, experimentally determined optical band gaps (OBG) from Tauc/Davis-Mott analysis of extinction spectra in various laminar, non-premixed flames had an average OBG of 2.1 eV. Based on the computations presented here, this work suggests that clusters with this OBG are comprised of modest molecular size PAH, about the size of ovalene. (C) 2016 by The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据