3.8 Proceedings Paper

Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Cascaded Anisotropic Convolutional Neural Networks

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_16

关键词

Brain tumor; Convolutional neural network Segmentation

资金

  1. Innovative Engineering for Health
  2. Wellcome Trust [WT101957]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [NS/A000027/1]
  4. National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR BRC UCLH/UCL High Impact Initiative)
  5. UCL Overseas Research Scholarship
  6. UCL Graduate Research Scholarship
  7. NVIDIA
  8. Health Innovation Challenge Fund [HICF-T4275, WT 97914]
  9. Department of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cascade of fully convolutional neural networks is proposed to segment multi-modal Magnetic Resonance (MR) images with brain tumor into background and three hierarchical regions: whole tumor, tumor core and enhancing tumor core. The cascade is designed to decompose the multi-class segmentation problem into a sequence of three binary segmentation problems according to the subregion hierarchy. The whole tumor is segmented in the first step and the bounding box of the result is used for the tumor core segmentation in the second step. The enhancing tumor core is then segmented based on the bounding box of the tumor core segmentation result. Our networks consist of multiple layers of anisotropic and dilated convolution filters, and they are combined with multi-view fusion to reduce false positives. Residual connections and multi-scale predictions are employed in these networks to boost the segmentation performance. Experiments with BraTS 2017 validation set show that the proposed method achieved average Dice scores of 0.7859, 0.9050, 0.8378 for enhancing tumor core, whole tumor and tumor core, respectively. The corresponding values for BraTS 2017 testing set were 0.7831, 0.8739, and 0.7748, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据