4.0 Article

Effects of exogenous sex hormones on mouse estrous cycle, vaginal microbiota and immune cells

期刊

出版社

SCANDINAVIAN FEDERATION LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE

关键词

-

资金

  1. CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientifi cas y Tecnicas, Argentina) [PIP 545]
  2. ANPCyT (Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifi ca y Tecnologica) [PICT 2013-1187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sex hormones are oft en administered to mice in vaginal microbial studies in order to synchronize estrous. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of estradiol-hemi succinate (EH) or medroxyprogesterone-acetate (MPA) administration on estrous cycle, vaginal microbiota, and immune cell populations of various organs in a murine model. Two-month-old female BALB/c mice were intramuscularly injected with EH (day -2) or MPA (day -5) to induce estrous (E) or diestrous (DE), respectively. On sampling days (Sd) 0, 2, 6 and 8, vaginal washings (v.w.), vagina, blood, spleen and bone marrow (BM) samples were taken. Most of the animals remained in E or DE states until Sd 6 aft er EH or MPA administration, respectively. The number of cultivable vaginal bacteria was not modified by hormonal treatments; higher quantities were detected in mice in E. Only EH administration modified serum sex hormone levels, increasing serum estradiol on Sd 0. In v.w., myeloid population was dominant while lymphoid populations were not detected. Only MPA administration induced a reduction in myeloid cells on Sd 0. Hormonal treatments did not affect myeloid populations in BM but caused a slight decrease in T and B cells. In spleen, hormonal administration did not affect B or T population size while an increase in mature B cells and a decrease in immature B cells were observed in MPA-treated mice compared with EH-treated mice. Thus, although both hormonal treatments induced slight changes in some of the parameters evaluated compared to control animals, adequately standardized and consistent experimental protocols were established for further studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据