4.7 Article

Effect of grid type and refinement method on CFD-DEM solution trend with grid size

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 311, 期 -, 页码 137-146

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.01.088

关键词

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD); Discrete Element Method (DEM); Grid-refinement study; Fixed particle bed

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [1610397]
  2. Procter and Gamble
  3. Division Of Graduate Education
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1610397] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identification and quantification of numerical error is complicated when Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is coupled with Discrete Element Method (DEM) to model particle-fluid interactions. The presence of solid particles in the model disrupts the typical monotonic convergence of CFD with grid size, due to the changing distribution Of calculated void fraction. Quantification of numerical error is crucial to the development of CFD-DEM as an analysis and design tool, but investigations of this error have been limited. Guidelines are needed for model design to permit the quantification of numerical error, and subsequent grid refinement to minimize error. The present study investigates the solution trend and relative numerical error for different computational grid types over a range of grid sizes. Simulations of flow through a stationary particle bed are conducted using computational grids for columns with circular and square cross-sections. A hybrid rectangular and cylindrical hex mesh is used for the circular cross-section column, while an initially cubic hex mesh is applied to the square cross-section column. Non-uniform, uniform, and one-dimensional refinements are individually performed on grids for both types of columns. The grid refinement study procedure by Celik et al. (2008) is applied to the solutidn trend of simulations using each uniform refinement method, and the resulting average grid convergence index (GCI) is shown in several cases to be a good predictor of the relative numerical error. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据