4.7 Article

The influence of forced ventilation airflow on water spray for dust suppression on heading face in underground coal mine

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 320, 期 -, 页码 498-510

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.07.069

关键词

Heading face; Forced ventilation; Dust suppression; Water spray; Airflow; Coalmine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51504249]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0805201]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015XKMS009]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water spray is the most commonly used method for suppressing mine dust. On the heading face of high gassy mine, forced ventilation is employed to dilute and discharge methane in order to prevent methane accumulation. In this paper, we utilize the program ANSYS FLUENT to investigate the influence of airflow from forced ventilation on the water spray flow field. The three-dimensional (3D) steady wind and spray flow models are successfully established and simulated under different spray pressures, which range from 0.5 MPa to 3.0 MPa. The results show that the wind wall produces a significant number of vortices from the interaction between the wind and heading face, which blocks the advance of the droplets. As spray pressure increases, the trajectory of the spray droplets is more strongly affected; i.e. the spray was so disturbed that it could not reach the dust source. The average droplet diameter gradually decreases, and the average droplet velocity first decreases and then increases as the spray pressure increases. Under the condition of this study, we find 2.4 MPa to be the optimal operating pressure for water spray to suppress dust at dust source on the coal wall, which can prevent dust from entering the mine air and effectively reduce the dust concentration. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据